unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Functions in libguile vs SRFIs
@ 2003-07-15 22:05 Stephen Compall
  2003-07-15 22:18 ` Nic
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Compall @ 2003-07-15 22:05 UTC (permalink / raw)


On the functions now duplicated (some with slight enhancements)
between libguile and the SRFIs:

Are the ones in libguile (going to be) deprecated?  If not, are the
SRFI versions preferred?  If not, IMHO, they should be, for the sake
of modularity (not to mention standards).

--
Stephen Compall or S11 or sirian

Too many people are thinking of security instead of opportunity.  They seem
more afraid of life than death.
                -- James F. Byrnes


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Functions in libguile vs SRFIs
  2003-07-15 22:05 Functions in libguile vs SRFIs Stephen Compall
@ 2003-07-15 22:18 ` Nic
  2003-07-17 22:39   ` Kevin Ryde
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nic @ 2003-07-15 22:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: guile-user

Stephen Compall <s11@member.fsf.org> writes:

> On the functions now duplicated (some with slight enhancements) 
> between libguile and the SRFIs: 
>  
> Are the ones in libguile (going to be) deprecated?  If not, are the 
> SRFI versions preferred?  If not, IMHO, they should be, for the sake 
> of modularity (not to mention standards). 

On this note: is the guile team interested in getting documentation
patches which merge the doc of srfi's into the body of the doc? 

For example: the section on Compound-Types/Lists includes all the
srfi-1 functions.

I'd be happy to do the occasional documentation patch on this basis.


Nic Ferrier



_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Functions in libguile vs SRFIs
  2003-07-15 22:18 ` Nic
@ 2003-07-17 22:39   ` Kevin Ryde
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2003-07-17 22:39 UTC (permalink / raw)


Nic <nferrier@tapsellferrier.co.uk> writes:
>
> On this note: is the guile team interested in getting documentation
> patches which merge the doc of srfi's into the body of the doc? 

I'd expect they ought to remain separate while the functions are in a
separate module.  Hopefully good index entries will make it easy to
find the two places.

(Incomplete indexing is a pet peeve of mine, so sing out if anyone has
looked under some topic and wasn't taken to the desired place.)


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-17 22:39 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-15 22:05 Functions in libguile vs SRFIs Stephen Compall
2003-07-15 22:18 ` Nic
2003-07-17 22:39   ` Kevin Ryde

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).