From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: loading a module Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 19:21:31 +0000 Message-ID: <87tyszvoec.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <46ec1c52e0bde393acf80afa204b8c26.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267471319 2217 80.91.229.12 (1 Mar 2010 19:21:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:21:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: "Tomas By" Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 01 20:21:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmBBj-0000fC-BY for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 20:21:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42934 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmBBi-0002VG-D7 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmBBe-0002UZ-UP for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:21:50 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34818 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmBBe-0002UB-7t for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:21:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmBBd-0002jj-6B for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:21:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:45949) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmBBd-0002jb-1r for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2010 14:21:49 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-182-154-126.range86-182.btcentralplus.com [86.182.154.126]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D551F69C2; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:21:47 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from arudy (arudy [127.0.0.1]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D34838026; Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:21:32 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <46ec1c52e0bde393acf80afa204b8c26.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl> (Tomas By's message of "Mon, 1 Mar 2010 19:58:40 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7663 Archived-At: "Tomas By" writes: > On Sun, February 28, 2010 23:59, Neil Jerram wrote: >> This is really a stab in the dark - but could you try using a name for >> the Scheme-level procedure that is different from the module name? >> Currently they are both "mytest". >> >> I think there could be some residual nonsense meaning for a binding that >> has the same name as the module... > > Thanks for the suggestion. I tried changing the name in the "define_gsubr" > and "export" statements and it made no difference. > > But it's ok. Compiling my own binary is fine for what I am doing. I'm not > sure why I bother so much about this in the first place. Maybe I should > have my head looked at. OK, fine. But please do come and ask us again if you need to, and we'll have another go. Neil