From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Can somebody help to explain why result from atan does not equal a real? Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:10:29 -0500 Message-ID: <87txpwe6wq.fsf@tines.lan> References: <87txpwgbc9.fsf@tines.lan> <87ip6cg9je.fsf@tines.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1359711107 1319 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2013 09:31:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 09:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Hengqing Hu Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 01 10:32:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U1CyY-0007w4-4k for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:32:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1CyG-0006iv-0K for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:31:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44550) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1CyB-0004sf-GK for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:31:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1CpI-00076W-VI for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:22:29 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:60054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Ce9-0004Le-Gw for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:10:57 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=tines.lan) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U1Cdt-0005eO-2U; Fri, 01 Feb 2013 04:10:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ip6cg9je.fsf@tines.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Thu, 31 Jan 2013 19:30:45 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9966 Archived-At: I wrote: > Having looked more closely, I see now that our 'string->number' is also > less precise than it should be. Sorry, I was mistaken about this. Our 'string->number' is fine. Mark