* stack overflow problem
@ 2006-02-04 10:54 William Xu
2006-02-04 23:03 ` Chusslove Illich
2006-02-05 1:18 ` Stephen Compall
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Xu @ 2006-02-04 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
I define the following function,
(define (enumerate-interval low high)
"Return a sequence list by walking from LOW to HIGH.
e.g.,
(enumerate-interval 1 10)
=> (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10)"
(if (> low high)
'()
(cons low (enumerate-interval (1+ low) high))))
When i passed it a slightly big interval, guile complains "stack
overflow",
guile > (enumerate-interval 1 400)
...
guile > (enumerate-interval 1 500)
ERROR: Stack overflow
ABORT: (stack-overflow)
guile>
Might be a bug? (i also tested this on mzscheme, and works fine.)
Guile version: 1.6.7, debian unstable.
--
William
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* stack overflow problem
@ 2006-02-04 17:09 William Xu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Xu @ 2006-02-04 17:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
[i wish i'm not resending this mail..]
Hi,
I define the following function,
(define (enumerate-interval low high)
"Return a sequence list by walking from LOW to HIGH.
e.g.,
(enumerate-interval 1 10)
=> (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10)"
(if (> low high)
'()
(cons low (enumerate-interval (1+ low) high))))
When i passed it a slightly big interval, guile complains "stack
overflow",
guile > (enumerate-interval 1 400)
...
guile > (enumerate-interval 1 500)
ERROR: Stack overflow
ABORT: (stack-overflow)
guile>
Might be a bug? (i also tested this on mzscheme, and works fine.)
Guile version: 1.6.7, debian unstable.
--
William
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: stack overflow problem
2006-02-04 10:54 stack overflow problem William Xu
@ 2006-02-04 23:03 ` Chusslove Illich
2006-02-05 1:18 ` Stephen Compall
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Chusslove Illich @ 2006-02-04 23:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 594 bytes --]
> [: William Xu :]
> Might be a bug? (i also tested this on mzscheme, and works fine.)
>
> Guile version: 1.6.7, debian unstable.
Same Debian, same Guile, same effect. I guess stack has to go at one point
or another, and it is anyway a better idea to use tail recursion:
(define (enumerate-interval low high)
(letrec ((helper
(lambda (low high seq)
(if (> low high)
seq
(helper low (1- high) (cons high seq))))))
(helper low high '())))
--
Chusslove Illich (Часлав Илић)
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: stack overflow problem
2006-02-04 10:54 stack overflow problem William Xu
2006-02-04 23:03 ` Chusslove Illich
@ 2006-02-05 1:18 ` Stephen Compall
2006-02-05 14:08 ` William Xu
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Compall @ 2006-02-05 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: guile-user
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1036 bytes --]
On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 18:54 +0800, William Xu wrote:
> (define (enumerate-interval low high)
> "Return a sequence list by walking from LOW to HIGH.
> e.g.,
> (enumerate-interval 1 10)
> => (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10)"
> (if (> low high)
> '()
> (cons low (enumerate-interval (1+ low) high))))
>
> When i passed it a slightly big interval, guile complains "stack
> overflow",
>
>
> Might be a bug? (i also tested this on mzscheme, and works fine.)
Sorry, but while optimization of tail calls is guaranteed by R5RS,
non-tail recursion to arbitrary depth is not. Try rewriting your code
so that the recursive call is the "last thing" done; to see what this
means, consider that in the recursion case, the "last thing" is
currently the call to cons.
See Section 33.3.7.1 (Stack overflow,
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/guile-ref/Debugger-options.html)
in the Guile Reference for details.
--
Stephen Compall
http://scompall.nocandysw.com/blog
[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: stack overflow problem
2006-02-05 1:18 ` Stephen Compall
@ 2006-02-05 14:08 ` William Xu
2006-02-13 18:08 ` Holger Blasum
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: William Xu @ 2006-02-05 14:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
Stephen Compall <s11@member.fsf.org> writes:
> On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 18:54 +0800, William Xu wrote:
>> (define (enumerate-interval low high)
>> "Return a sequence list by walking from LOW to HIGH.
>> e.g.,
>> (enumerate-interval 1 10)
>> => (1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10)"
>> (if (> low high)
>> '()
>> (cons low (enumerate-interval (1+ low) high))))
>>
>> When i passed it a slightly big interval, guile complains "stack
>> overflow",
>>
>>
>> Might be a bug? (i also tested this on mzscheme, and works fine.)
>
> Sorry, but while optimization of tail calls is guaranteed by R5RS,
> non-tail recursion to arbitrary depth is not. Try rewriting your code
> so that the recursive call is the "last thing" done;
Yeah, i understand that. But i thought this ought to be done
automatically in some way, not requiring user to do this manually, which
would make codes less readable, isn't it?
[...]
--
William
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: stack overflow problem
2006-02-05 14:08 ` William Xu
@ 2006-02-13 18:08 ` Holger Blasum
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Holger Blasum @ 2006-02-13 18:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: guile-user
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 380 bytes --]
On 02-05, William Xu wrote:
> Yeah, i understand that. But i thought this ought to be done
> automatically in some way, not requiring user to do this manually, which
> would make codes less readable, isn't it?
(debug-set! stack 0)
would do the trick (disabling stack depth management) afaik?
--
Holger Blasum +49-174-7313590 (gsm) GnuPG 1024D/ACDFC3B769DC1ED66B47
[-- Attachment #1.2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-02-13 18:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-02-04 10:54 stack overflow problem William Xu
2006-02-04 23:03 ` Chusslove Illich
2006-02-05 1:18 ` Stephen Compall
2006-02-05 14:08 ` William Xu
2006-02-13 18:08 ` Holger Blasum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-04 17:09 William Xu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).