From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: A bit further toward the flamewar Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:26:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87sjmvpjqs.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20111012153958.GA20242@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> <87pqi2ca3q.fsf@gnu.org> <8739exry15.fsf@pobox.com> <20111013112709.GA28078@ccellier.rd.securactive.lan> <87r52hc6hu.fsf@gnu.org> <87r52grk90.fsf@pobox.com> <1318531070.78010.YahooMailNeo@web37908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <87hb3cq8n9.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1318613213 26181 80.91.229.12 (14 Oct 2011 17:26:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:26:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , "guile-user@gnu.org" To: linasvepstas@gmail.com Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 14 19:26:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RElWv-0001il-KY for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 19:26:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51112 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RElWv-0002Yx-33 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RElWr-0002YJ-Ad for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RElWp-0001cu-TP for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:41 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:48671 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RElWp-0001cn-PX; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:39 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8AB575BC; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=TJLYML1dyyjvHeAwfFtbpffSbug=; b=EYNPbt Crv4k01KPKBKN6U0eBYbPocSgSfinnwOIJU+aRyoZ9Qg82ejnP+BF/iqgfNiPQYP ov2VORbueVrpyCtOu1LwyTDoXynjshLAR9kLXAzYKgU78zSSfJEesfUDbNJlZ2XL 9JoK/j7HMmP7aYHFJ6T96RvK4deKlHccnD4q4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=of8FxHI7Pp9/ujL3qeMGqPAyrwDIc5xM kpGNLrm4aiwGmf6FzTDLrDRCxsUaR8oEL4hKhM58d5uw6ssvojIIJaP/a0d4GSkW QezuoQdJxg5BgV17jCddKJq2jGJ8z+NxP9VrNC/E0HtKRdvU7n3JFOuUvuCZanUv F+S5L3dPg4o= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD62A75BB; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:38 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B08775BA; Fri, 14 Oct 2011 13:26:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Linas Vepstas's message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:30:38 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AC5D5B38-F689-11E0-BB73-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:8892 Archived-At: On Fri 14 Oct 2011 18:30, Linas Vepstas writes: > Let me demonstrate my ignorance: what pattern-matching srfi > should I be using? See "Pattern Matching" in the manual. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/