From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marko Rauhamaa Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Nonblocking get-bytevector-n bug? Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:02:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87si3csinm.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> References: <87h9jvuxb3.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87k2opymoc.fsf@netris.org> <87poygu9n4.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <20151208192807.384d4347@bother.homenet> <8737vctxqv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449612191 9793 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 22:03:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 22:03:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Chris Vine Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 23:03:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6QLj-0004Uj-HY for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 23:03:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33698 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6QLi-0000HI-Iq for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:03:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6QLZ-0000H8-Gx for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:02:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6QLY-0000ts-Lb for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:02:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:1bc8:1a0:5384:7a2b:cbff:fe9f:e508] (port=60310 helo=pacujo.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6QLY-0000td-Ej for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 17:02:56 -0500 Original-Received: from elektro.pacujo.net (192.168.1.200) by elektro.pacujo.net; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 00:02:53 +0200 Original-Received: by elektro.pacujo.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:02:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8737vctxqv.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (Marko Rauhamaa's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2015 23:51:36 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:1bc8:1a0:5384:7a2b:cbff:fe9f:e508 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:12232 Archived-At: Marko Rauhamaa : > It seems to me whoever wrote the spec wasn't thinking of nonblocking > ports at all. Are nonblocking ports recognized by RnRS? Took a quick glance at the R6RS spec. It would appear nonblocking ports are *not* mentioned or thought of in it. Thus, *any* nonblocking behavior would be an extension to R6RS, and Guile can do whatever it wishes. Marko