From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Using a macro with FOLD alters FOLD procedure! Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:45:58 -0500 Message-ID: <87r7h8q5dl.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <56190b6c05041511382ae259d@mail.gmail.com> <1113594648.3650.8.camel@cslabpc3.evansville.edu> <56190b6c05041515205fd8b6a@mail.gmail.com> <4260FB26.4080607@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113785706 12426 80.91.229.2 (18 Apr 2005 00:55:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 00:55:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile User List Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 18 02:54:57 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNKXI-00035I-0J for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 02:54:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNKbI-0002XE-Hc for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:58:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DNKau-0002JS-5N for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:58:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DNKam-0002FF-Ic for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:58:25 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DNKam-0002DO-GS for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:58:24 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DNKQC-00036b-2V for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 20:47:28 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 412CB4081; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:46:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B2E8941192; Sun, 17 Apr 2005 19:45:59 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: Neil Jerram In-Reply-To: <4260FB26.4080607@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 16 Apr 2005 12:46:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4389 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4389 Neil Jerram writes: > FWIW, I agree. In 1.7.x I believe we have more of the infrastructure > in place to get this right - by which I mean to signal an error if a > macro is passed in this way. But (having just tried your tests out on > 1.7.x) it's not doing this just yet. I haven't considered it carefully yet, but if fold's only supposed to take a procedure for kons, then why not just add a check-arg-type procedure? call for kons? -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user