From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: case syntax and symbols Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 22:26:42 +0300 Message-ID: <87r7ffi8wd.fsf@zagadka.de> References: <1111445850.6034.15.camel@vandvndr.physics.uiuc.edu> <87is3k1oxe.fsf@zagadka.de> <423FC796.4010303@ossau.uklinux.net> <874qcv40q4.fsf@zagadka.de> <4292236E.1050000@ossau.uklinux.net> <87mzqk7t0p.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1118088040 5311 80.91.229.2 (6 Jun 2005 20:00:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 20:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, Neil Jerram Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 22:00:37 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNjt-0004pN-L3 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 21:58:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNqG-0004iz-Lu for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNoB-00049f-Tf for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:02:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNoB-00049K-7A for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:02:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DfNne-0003s3-Nm for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 16:02:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.243.153.37] (helo=smtp1.pp.htv.fi) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DfNIN-0003Ac-Fl for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2005 15:29:59 -0400 Original-Received: from zagadka.ping.de (cs181072157.pp.htv.fi [82.181.72.157]) by smtp1.pp.htv.fi (Postfix) with SMTP id 9AFC07FCEB for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 22:26:41 +0300 (EEST) Original-Received: (qmail 11144 invoked by uid 1000); 6 Jun 2005 19:26:42 -0000 Original-To: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) In-Reply-To: <87mzqk7t0p.fsf@laas.fr> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s's?= message of "Tue, 24 May 2005 13:39:02 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4613 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4613 ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > There is probably code that relies on redefinitions being silently > interpreted as a `set!', I'm afraid. So I don't think Guile should > start issuing warnings for redefinitions by default. The warnings would be about redefinitions that would not have the same effect as a 'set!': there would be a warning when a new variable is created and an existing variable would become invisible. --=20 GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user