From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Problem with modules in Guile 2.0 Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:29:34 -0500 Message-ID: <87r4x1spox.fsf@netris.org> References: <54183C89-DE93-417E-84EC-5C454E56EE35@gmail.com> <87eht4yww5.fsf@pobox.com> <79B073AF-B3A8-46E0-A047-C4F5686E167E@gmail.com> <87obs7vojn.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1331310723 24673 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2012 16:32:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 16:32:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Gubinelli Massimiliano Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 09 17:32:02 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S62jX-0004bn-3L for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:31:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57594 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S62jW-0001Uu-Ef for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:31:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42674) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S62jO-0001Tv-Q9 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:31:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S62jK-0001KX-2R for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:31:50 -0500 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:51343) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S62jJ-0001KP-UB for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:31:45 -0500 Original-Received: from 209-6-91-212.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([209.6.91.212] helo=yeeloong) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S62jC-0002AG-L2; Fri, 09 Mar 2012 11:31:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Gubinelli Massimiliano's message of "Fri, 9 Mar 2012 01:03:38 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9335 Archived-At: Gubinelli Massimiliano writes: > Hi Mark, > thanks again. I start to understand better the Guile 2 compile > system. I decided to dig into boot-9.scm to have a more precise idea > of the ecosystem around my scripts. Unfortunately it seems that the > basic TeXmacs scripting infrastructure need a major change to be run > into Guile 2.0 and I'm afraid not to be sufficiently proficient in > scheme to do this in a short time. Why not convert your scripts to use the standard Guile module syntax? > Is there anyone on this list which would like to assist me to port GNU > TeXmacs to Guile 2.0. Currently the code in svn builds fine against > 2.0 so the problem is just to adapt the scheme scripts which rely on a > customized module system. I'd be glad to take a look. Where can I find your scripts? Regards, Mark