From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile can't find a chinese named file Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:33:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87r32kskmp.fsf@pobox.com> References: <874m0gd3z4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpdc8rx7.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87poj4r04c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k29c8q3b.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87h94gqz34.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fuk0ctve.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488144915 32340 195.159.176.226 (26 Feb 2017 21:35:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:35:15 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: Guile User To: Linas Vepstas Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 26 22:35:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6TF-0007mv-8y for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 22:35:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48406 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6TL-0002Ek-8Z for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:35:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35107) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6RQ-0001RU-Oh for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:33:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6RM-0001cZ-SA for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:33:16 -0500 Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.67]:64612 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ci6RM-0001cS-Ou for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:33:12 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0192B6225E; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:33:12 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=5iWBdlETItFXqbAAEWX72SmX/58=; b=s3hixT vQKUq80thHV/YnFf3UyTBN6piB472sGtfYdLSvoo72iQq6UUX1Mj53MiYWyky+uV vsgf1ZfJq/ZxVXQqg3U0P/ozf6ataqVQ3EfnZrbt6xaw/L7vfrnO14NzyEuH74OV e+XDfXJsNaLQIB4YNghFnqwuV5L8TU2nSzgMw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=D8DbVLB9vWWHcCa1Jo9c+TYgEumBFifd TFNluOnbNE1M+cQJZxzKNFSwbjTHnW+Eua9Dvk2YF4BBe1EN1UjSnrjNkZwLJc83 dwvwUTDvFSusN2XfQ/b2e9vpafJmqEtjDkzRN8k6wFHjy61HCN9DW8he7pw5vONP WuwvijeM8hM= Original-Received: from pb-sasl2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBFF6225D; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:33:11 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D322E6225C; Sun, 26 Feb 2017 16:33:10 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Linas Vepstas's message of "Tue, 14 Feb 2017 13:58:31 -0600") X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2C16548C-FC6B-11E6-9AF4-6141F2301B6D-02397024!pb-sasl2.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 64.147.108.67 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13328 Archived-At: On Tue 14 Feb 2017 20:58, Linas Vepstas writes: > Guile's mistake is that it does lots of pointless conversions from utf8 strings > to wide-char arrays, and back, which is a) a cpu suck, and b) a breeding > ground for bugs. The current 2.1 guile, in git as of a few weeks ago, has > multiple utf8 handling bugs. What bugs are these? I just found 25397 which I think was initially a misunderstanding on your part, then you added more expected behaviors that were not specified in the manual, and vaguely hint at more bugs; perplexing! Please be more direct when reporting bugs (i.e. bug-guile etc). Thanks in advance. Andy