From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: How guile knows? Date: 11 Jan 2003 18:27:47 -0800 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ptr3drvg.fsf@becket.becket.net> References: <20030109141923.GA23577@kolos.math.uni.lodz.pl> <03011118254404.01603@locke.free-expression.org> <87znq7durn.fsf@becket.becket.net> <03011120573605.01603@locke.free-expression.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1042340916 17194 80.91.224.249 (12 Jan 2003 03:08:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 03:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Neil Jerram Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18XYUF-0004TC-00 for ; Sun, 12 Jan 2003 04:08:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18XYSS-0007rU-06 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:06:44 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18XYS6-0007e2-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:06:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18XYRy-0007C9-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:06:17 -0500 Original-Received: from vp190174.reshsg.uci.edu ([128.195.190.174] helo=becket.becket.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18XYRx-00079v-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 22:06:13 -0500 Original-Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18XXql-0002Sg-00; Sat, 11 Jan 2003 18:27:47 -0800 Original-To: Lynn Winebarger X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute permission for an emailed response. X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92 X-Windows: The problem for your problem. In-Reply-To: <03011120573605.01603@locke.free-expression.org> Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Original-cc: guile-user@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1540 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1540 Lynn Winebarger writes: > On Saturday 11 January 2003 20:25, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > > But the *module* is not the module name. The fact that the binding > > from module-name to module is near infinite (though it's incorrect to > > say it can't be gcd) has nothing to do with the module itself. > > Are you sure that it's implemented that way in Guile, or just > propounding how it should be implemented? The latter. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user