From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marko Rauhamaa Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Nonblocking get-bytevector-n bug? Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:34:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87poygu9n4.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> References: <87h9jvuxb3.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87k2opymoc.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449596096 9089 80.91.229.3 (8 Dec 2015 17:34:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 17:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 08 18:34:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MAA-0007tH-8T for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 18:34:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32775 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MA9-0003wU-IF for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:34:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6MA0-0003w4-2G for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6M9z-00011C-66 for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:34:44 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:1bc8:1a0:5384:7a2b:cbff:fe9f:e508] (port=59847 helo=pacujo.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6M9y-000106-Vz for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2015 12:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from elektro.pacujo.net (192.168.1.200) by elektro.pacujo.net; Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:34:39 +0200 Original-Received: by elektro.pacujo.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 08 Dec 2015 19:34:39 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87k2opymoc.fsf@netris.org> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 08 Dec 2015 10:39:31 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:1bc8:1a0:5384:7a2b:cbff:fe9f:e508 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:12229 Archived-At: Mark H Weaver : > While I'm reluctant to guarantee any fixed limit, I can offer this: the > returned bytevector will always be of a manageable size, > > [...] > > Would this work for you? It suits my immediate needs, thank you. However, I think the whole slew of bytevector I/O could take a more relaxed reading of the RnRS spec, which probably was simply worded carelessly. Marko