From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: 1.6.0 problems with libguilereadline-v-12 and fix Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:29:32 -0500 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87ofatde9f.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> References: <20020918203311.3C5FA3F28@fnord.ir.bbn.com> <87k7ljgfvd.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87znuegbw8.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87sn06ek95.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020919100333.GB7220@www> <8765x2dnum.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <20020919152759.GD7480@www> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032460194 9744 127.0.0.1 (19 Sep 2002 18:29:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 18:29:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Greg Troxel , guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17s63j-0002Wk-00 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 20:29:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17s641-00054a-00; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17s63T-00053B-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:29:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17s63R-00052o-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:29:35 -0400 Original-Received: from n66644228.ipcdsl.net ([66.64.4.228] helo=defaultvalue.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17s63R-00052j-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:29:33 -0400 Original-Received: from raven.i.defaultvalue.org (raven.i.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFFC4425; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:29:32 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by raven.i.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 695615DD; Thu, 19 Sep 2002 13:29:32 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: rm@fabula.de In-Reply-To: <20020919152759.GD7480@www> (rm@fabula.de's message of "Thu, 19 Sep 2002 17:27:59 +0200") Original-Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1033 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1033 rm@fabula.de writes: >> As it stands now, the answer is "both". That's one of the main >> reasons this problem is hard. > > For me that sounds like a good reason for making these two things separate > issues by using different code. Hmm. Which two things? The canonical example I tend to think of is srfi-4. libguile-srfi-srfi-4 is intended to be used both by (use-modules (srfi srfi-4)) *and* by any app that needs to do things like scm_make_u8vector > Thanks for all the feedback np. This is something we definitely need to work out, though I'd be happiest if we can work out a solution that fixes the problem at the lowest, most-helpful level. i.e. It would be really nice if we came up with a solution that could be used by others as well... -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user