From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Which hashtable API to use? Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:08:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87ob8xpw2t.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <520E0F3E.8060509@gmx.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376661963 1430 80.91.229.3 (16 Aug 2013 14:06:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 14:06:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Alexandru Cojocaru Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 16 16:06:04 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VAKfC-00068N-9A for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:06:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAKfB-0005Ts-Ri for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:06:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42498) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAKew-0005Th-TM for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:05:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAKeq-0004y7-Ei for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:05:46 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:51171) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VAKep-0004xy-Su for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 10:05:40 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (79.10.68.30) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 51FA21FE048BE3DE; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:05:37 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VAKhf-0005Hu-8p; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:08:35 +0200 In-Reply-To: <520E0F3E.8060509@gmx.com> (Alexandru Cojocaru's message of "Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:38:38 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10643 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Alexandru Cojocaru () Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:38:38 +0200 currently there are three hashtable APIs [...] Which one to choose? It's best to choose what you feel comfortable maintaining. It's next best to choose what you can write and understand. After that is cut and paste copying from other people's code. Worst is abiding blindly by advice in a j.r.hacker posting... =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlIOMlwACgkQZwMiJEyAdQKfEwCfUF1rAYPlg4xuShE7/wKoBtAA jckAnjpdfxCtbjOKKWNRW12EfD6DmbId =v3AK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--