From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Modified load-path proposal Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:49:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87mzlaisbd.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <878xwx5ld2.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87u0fl3wam.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87achbja4s.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129398656 13248 80.91.229.2 (15 Oct 2005 17:50:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:50:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Users Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 19:50:48 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQqA4-0007l0-L6 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 19:49:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQqA4-0006xW-3P for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:49:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EQq9z-0006xQ-Us for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:49:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EQq9y-0006xE-DF for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:49:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EQq9y-0006xB-8y for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EQq9y-0007JV-FE for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:49:30 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-139-127-30.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.127.30]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516BA409FB3; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 17:49:29 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9D96F6C4; Sat, 15 Oct 2005 18:49:27 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Greg Troxel In-Reply-To: (Greg Troxel's message of "15 Oct 2005 11:01:15 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4852 Archived-At: Greg Troxel writes: > I meant that when a guile-using package does 'make install', it can > hook itself into the already-installed guile. Guile can and certainly > should create config.scm in the build tree before install. Then, > regardless of whether a binary package of some sort is tarred up from > there, or it's installed first and then tarred up (pkgsrc) won't matter. Yes, agreed on both points. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user