From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Reporting bugs Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:43:28 +1100 Message-ID: <87mzg7jdr3.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <20060228035525.97086.qmail@web32515.mail.mud.yahoo.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1141430152 6712 80.91.229.2 (3 Mar 2006 23:55:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:55:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 04 00:55:50 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFK7c-0003qB-P1 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 00:55:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFK7e-0005wx-5H for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:55:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FFJwE-0007yR-Kj for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1FFJwA-0007vv-JB for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:43:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FFJwA-0007vk-C0 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:43:54 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.115] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1FFJxw-0002QP-AE for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2006 18:45:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7006FF9F; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 10:43:50 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp224D.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.34.77]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k23NhnOD024109; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 10:43:50 +1100 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1FFJvk-0000Ac-00; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 10:43:28 +1100 Original-To: spikegran@earthlink.net In-Reply-To: <20060228035525.97086.qmail@web32515.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (Mike Gran's message of "Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:55:25 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:5197 Archived-At: Mike Gran writes: > > The 1.8 ref manual (sec 2.5) still says bug-guile@gnu.org is the way to > report bugs. But, http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=guile exists, > too. > > Is one of those two a preferred method? Savannah relays to bug-guile. bug-guile is generally better because there's a chance of actually responding to or querying the reporter, which you don't get in an anon report at savannah. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user