From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Gmp now working, but number.c:147 isinf declared implicitly. Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:38:40 +1100 Message-ID: <87mz4hxj73.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <87fyafvol7.fsf@zip.com.au> <87k5zoujb0.fsf@zip.com.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1169080752 4779 80.91.229.12 (18 Jan 2007 00:39:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 00:39:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 18 01:39:08 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H7LJ5-0006b3-UI for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 01:39:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7LJ6-0007dY-FR for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:39:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7LIz-0007YR-1G for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:39:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1H7LIx-0007WH-Iw for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:39:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1H7LIx-0007W5-Fg for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:38:59 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.2.231] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1H7LIw-0002xk-QS for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Jan 2007 19:38:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9CB6E199; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:38:54 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp28CB.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.40.203]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A047D2741E; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:38:55 +1100 (EST) Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1H7LIe-0001jl-SP; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 11:38:40 +1100 Original-To: Hugh Sasse In-Reply-To: (Hugh Sasse's message of "Tue, 16 Jan 2007 10:11:46 +0000 (WET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:5792 Archived-At: Hugh Sasse writes: > > That rather depends on for whom they are developing. Aguments in > "Brave Gnu World" about software use in the third world where download > speeds are still limited, Yep, such as Australia. The theory as I see it though is that there's barely a dozen developers and it's reasonable to ask them to keep more or less current, in the interests of having releases use the latest stuff, which can be quite important when those tools have bug fixes. There's a disturbingly large amount of tools code included in every package :-(. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user