From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Any advice about improving the docs? Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:57:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87mx9w66vm.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87ipn1coos.fsf@goof.bjgalaxy> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1326135491 12361 80.91.229.12 (9 Jan 2012 18:58:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 18:58:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: b3timmons@speedymail.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 09 19:58:07 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RkKQ2-0006Zl-J7 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:58:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57673 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkKQ2-00026b-2Z for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:58:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41482) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkKPx-000230-K4 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkKPr-0006SQ-Jt for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:58:01 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:45630 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RkKPr-0006SL-G1 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2012 13:57:55 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AA88CDE; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:57:55 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=uJQJiQrIuIECjLjDcNmFFM0flwk=; b=E3Ah/S k76RW194cqFhURAR9mZSHZYa3ut1rI5gCX3/ejY5IPUuGNlbwdHcwgak1sHFrRxg dhzQ9LHEEdxFfsWm58FjE9ik+WAbziwaxBoNSM3JUuSSjZEuWh+zjGqCJT9sCXGw 9qVgJ0E/Ocacsd9+moUPlvMORxYywauaFk7gA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=jRNtQUlPGujUWxBSxU0z/0MAACf9vdua WBaESfwm9hRs6FERDiVnCSNFROmzEcN2RTD72JQdY2t3K5SamsrvtYDk2IsB09gM qTLZlK0FcuF9b7bbq58dJRCMKfdfGqkEs0jrlg0dQ6ZVsbhTNaeGuQGBKqEYTG2M RDNQqjc50k0= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDCF8CDD; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:57:55 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B15D8CDC; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 13:57:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87ipn1coos.fsf@goof.bjgalaxy> (42toes@gmail.com's message of "Thu, 03 Nov 2011 09:37:07 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D594FD7C-3AF3-11E1-99BC-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9108 Archived-At: On Thu 03 Nov 2011 14:37, 42toes@gmail.com writes: > I seek advice on making the Guile manual and docstrings clearer and more > consistent, two qualities that I think novices especially appreciate. We are still very much interested in your contributions, especially now that the assignment forms are in :-) We will be releasing a 2.0.4 soonish, perhaps within a week, and so now is a perfect time to send a series of small, easy-to-apply, git-format-patch produced attachments to the list :-) Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/