From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Modified load-path proposal Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:22:31 +0000 Message-ID: <87ll091og8.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <878xwx5ld2.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87u0fl3wam.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87oe5s51l4.fsf@ivanova.rotty.yi.org> <87ek6njah0.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r7adf8h1.fsf@zip.com.au> <87vezhbknv.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87u0ey3mph.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <873bmi392j.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130786662 1204 80.91.229.2 (31 Oct 2005 19:24:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:24:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 31 20:24:22 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWfF2-0001Cb-TM for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:22:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWfF2-0001vZ-Bg for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:22:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EWfEw-0001v2-PQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EWfEv-0001uZ-4U for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:22:42 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EWfEv-0001uW-1y for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EWfEu-0001Rm-UX for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 14:22:41 -0500 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-130-88-151.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.130.88.151]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A1A409FCC; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491B46F718; Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:22:31 +0000 (GMT) Original-To: ttn@glug.org In-Reply-To: (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2005 05:55:37 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4923 Archived-At: Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > From: Neil Jerram > Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:59:32 +0000 > > Not sure what you mean by "to get around it". Do you mean that > someone will change the design so that the interface does the > enforcement itself; or that if the interface is precise about what it > allows, someone will want to change it to be more permissive in future? > > both interpretations are fine. Yes, but which one did you mean? It seems to me that they have opposite implications. > perlis? > > google? Fair point. Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user