From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Taylan Ulrich Bayirli/Kammer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: A couple of questions about goops method parameters Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:18:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87lhpxg6ta.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> References: <1409905923.9245.5.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> <871trpridm.fsf@izanagi.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1409948315 12159 80.91.229.3 (5 Sep 2014 20:18:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:18:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Carlos Pita , David Thompson , "guile-user@gnu.org" To: Panicz Maciej Godek Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 05 22:18:29 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XPzxj-000498-Vb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 22:18:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60066 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPzxf-00024S-FG for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:18:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36245) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPzxV-00023V-TZ for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPzxV-0006Ho-4J for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]:65431) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPzxU-0006HX-RC for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 16:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id pn19so14561509lab.32 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:18:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=97UuDFMbdDOJkWPIbTpCoCv00I180SXvu3hxfXvmCJ0=; b=JWb0z2k0waUEKJmiBV0cRhWSSTAi/zZwzcOGUdrXnm3jwlhN5AjU2NAsk8zFyOJejx FXJW1HVwLA/cwtK8ZFySvAMB/G4XgmoIsMrE9oZhfylNg3XRyD04hKKGSiuhrsM5B8T6 K3yYaa2E4drtvUQUlK5tY3R2YIWbEpoPfa/g+AfMygr0OLdA7oUu4+/KtJ49wW04E0Eo zkCsz0MPSphLgCO3qU5aSlHZ3aGcM9tEK6VnBdcNeg6Ya9r2/u5WGXx5iISOa/dpi2Ta Ii9jyI1atMgqH/lqI0EIfYC85VhVTAPdvhJg4QeArFDG9cnqwNhzwUJ+m85szQfb+yPV Z51w== X-Received: by 10.112.138.201 with SMTP id qs9mr10271114lbb.41.1409948291671; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:18:11 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from taylan.uni.cx (p200300514A1DE4510213E8FFFEED36FB.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:51:4a1d:e451:213:e8ff:feed:36fb]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pw9sm1059300lbb.2.2014.09.05.13.18.10 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:18:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Panicz Maciej Godek's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 2014 22:10:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:11465 Archived-At: Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > [...] I think that it is a big problem of Scheme, that it does not > have any noncontroversial and commonly accepted way for creating named > tuples. Does SRFI-9 not count because it creates tuple *types* and doesn't support immediate creation of tuples of an "anonymous type"? (Could be an interesting feature, though not sure how useful in the end.) Or do you just not consider SRFI-9 to be commonly accepted? AFAIK it's pretty widely implemented, and for the record(!) it's been standardized as a part of R7RS-small. Taylan