From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Marius Vollmer Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: The Guile license and the use of LGPL libs (like GMP). Date: 04 Jun 2002 00:25:20 +0200 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87k7pgj8z3.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> References: <87vg9oqf5b.fsf_-_@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <877klouny2.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <1022612306.7214.155.camel@firetrap> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1023143396 10444 127.0.0.1 (3 Jun 2002 22:29:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 22:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 17F0Kq-0002iL-00 for ; Tue, 04 Jun 2002 00:29:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17F0IA-0004I8-00; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 18:27:10 -0400 Original-Received: from dialin.speedway42.dip31.dokom.de ([195.138.42.31] helo=zagadka.ping.de) by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 17F0GP-0004Dh-00 for ; Mon, 03 Jun 2002 18:25:21 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 1645 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Jun 2002 22:25:20 -0000 Original-To: Greg Troxel In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:523 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:523 Greg Troxel writes: > So I'd really hate to see the exception abandoned - it would > essentially mean the end of guile use in my workplace, or at least a > great diminishment. What would prohibit you from using Guile if it would be licensed under the Lesser GPL? (I guess it might be section 6 of the LGPL that requires you to enable all recipients of your "work that uses the library" to replace libguile with a suitably modified version of libguile.) _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user