Re: How about a release?

Re: How about a release?

[stefan]

On Sun, 23 Mar 2003, Andreas Rottmann wrote:

> I just checked with Guile 1.7 and the Guile servers seem to
> work. However, for the binary test I get:
>
> andy@alice:~/src/contrib/serveez/test% serveez -f binary-test.scm
> [2003/03/23 17:18:54] debug: cache: created 64 cache entries
> [2003/03/23 17:18:54] notice: Linux 2.4.20 on i686
> undefined:0:0: Exception due to `unbound-variable'
> scm_must_free is deprecated.  Use scm_gc_malloc and scm_gc_free instead.
> guile-error: Unbound variable: serveez-verbosity
> [2003/03/23 17:18:54] error: error loading config file

Hm.  This could possibly also occur with Guile 1.6.x version.  The
variable 'serveez-verbosity' is defined via scm_c_define_gsubr() in the C
part of Serveez.  The 'binary-test.scm' script uses the module
'test-suite.scm' which uses 'serveez-verbosity'.  Apparently this is also
a question for <guile-user@gnu.org>.  Somehow it seems the symbol
'serveez-verbosity' is not visible in the test-suite module.  How can this
be achieved?

A pending task for a new release is also to clarify whether there are
replacement for these symbols:

         U gh_scm2chars
         U gh_scm2newstr
         U gh_symbol2newstr

The guile developers wanted to drop the gh interface in future.  These
three symbols are yet used by Serveez + Guile 1.6.x, everything else is
properly replaced by its scm_() equivalents.

So what are the equivalents for the mentioned symbols?

Cheers,
	stefan@lkcc.org

Re: [dev-serveez] How about a release?

[Rob Browning]

stefan <stefan@lkcc.org> writes:

>          U gh_scm2chars
>          U gh_scm2newstr
>          U gh_symbol2newstr
>
> So what are the equivalents for the mentioned symbols?

Off the top of my head, I think it's probably:

  gh_scm2chars -> scm_c_scm2chars
  gh_scm2newstr -> scm_c_string2str
  gh_symbol2newstr -> scm_c_symbol2str

-- 
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org
Previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592  F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user

Re: How about a release?

[stefan]

On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Rob Browning wrote:

> stefan <stefan@lkcc.org> writes:
>
> >          U gh_scm2chars
> >          U gh_scm2newstr
> >          U gh_symbol2newstr
> >
> > So what are the equivalents for the mentioned symbols?
>
> Off the top of my head, I think it's probably:
>
>   gh_scm2chars -> scm_c_scm2chars
>   gh_scm2newstr -> scm_c_string2str
>   gh_symbol2newstr -> scm_c_symbol2str

Thanks a lot.

I applied appropriate changes to the Serveez code.

Andreas: Could you please check whether Guile 1.7.x (CVS) yet works with
         it?  Is there still any "gh_" in `nm serveez'?

Thanks,
	stefan@lkcc.org

Re: How about a release?

[Andreas Rottmann]

stefan <stefan@lkcc.org> writes:

> On Tue, 1 Apr 2003, Rob Browning wrote:
> 
> > stefan <stefan@lkcc.org> writes:
> >
> > >          U gh_scm2chars
> > >          U gh_scm2newstr
> > >          U gh_symbol2newstr
> > >
> > > So what are the equivalents for the mentioned symbols?
> >
> > Off the top of my head, I think it's probably:
> >
> >   gh_scm2chars -> scm_c_scm2chars
> >   gh_scm2newstr -> scm_c_string2str
> >   gh_symbol2newstr -> scm_c_symbol2str
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> I applied appropriate changes to the Serveez code.
> 
> Andreas: Could you please check whether Guile 1.7.x (CVS) yet works with
>          it?  Is there still any "gh_" in `nm serveez'?
> 
Guile servers seem to work, and there is no gh_ in `nm serveez`.

Regards, Andy
-- 
Andreas Rottmann         | Rotty@ICQ      | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint              | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219  F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62

Packages should build-depend on what they should build-depend.