From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Is ice-9/poe.scm broken? Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:46:00 +1000 Message-ID: <87k6iq1x6f.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <42F77FAA.5020001@mail.msen.com> <87u0hyo8pt.fsf@zip.com.au> <878xz9a0d4.fsf@zagadka.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1123894663 24180 80.91.229.2 (13 Aug 2005 00:57:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 00:57:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 13 02:57:36 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3kL2-0004Fn-Sq for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 02:57:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3kLf-0000bU-Ff for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E3kLI-0000Y0-Lm for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:57:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1E3kL7-0000Sr-Rp for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:57:35 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1E3kL6-0000Pb-98 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 20:57:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1E3kOn-0005II-4O for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2005 21:01:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7D0k5Wm002679; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:46:05 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2831.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.40.49]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7D0k43R022168; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:46:05 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1E3k9x-0000pk-00; Sat, 13 Aug 2005 10:46:01 +1000 Original-To: Marius Vollmer In-Reply-To: <878xz9a0d4.fsf@zagadka.de> (Marius Vollmer's message of "Thu, 11 Aug 2005 01:33:11 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4689 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:4689 Marius Vollmer writes: > > Could you try to fix this in 1.6 as well? I put it in, I think it works. On the merely dodgy as opposed to broken front, I suspect the hash function should be using logxor, and that perfect-funcq doesn't need to work the base-func into the hash, since the hash is private the each func. _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user