From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Modified load-path proposal Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:30:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87k6g9b0mu.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <878xwx5ld2.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <8764s0a7e6.fsf@laas.fr> <8764rzj8py.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87ach8bmdg.fsf@laas.fr> <87oe5o81xi.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87fyqzl0ku.fsf@laas.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129761138 29352 80.91.229.2 (19 Oct 2005 22:32:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:32:18 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 00:32:07 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMSJ-0004mw-1a for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2005 00:30:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMSI-0002a3-Dv for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:30:42 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMSE-0002Zl-Qo for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMSE-0002ZZ-CJ for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESMSE-0002ZW-8b for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from [80.84.72.33] (helo=mail3.uklinux.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESMSE-0001Vd-BA for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 18:30:38 -0400 Original-Received: from laruns (host81-139-117-151.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.139.117.151]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9455D409FFF for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 22:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from laruns (laruns [127.0.0.1]) by laruns (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A416F6CE for ; Wed, 19 Oct 2005 23:30:33 +0100 (BST) Original-To: Guile Users In-Reply-To: <87fyqzl0ku.fsf@laas.fr> ( =?iso-8859-1?q?Ludovic_Court=E8s's_message_of?= "Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:57:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:4879 Archived-At: ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > There were really two points in my message: > > 1. Autoconf/Automake (and, consequently, the user) _must_ know about > these three different directories, namely `guileschemedir', > `guilelibdir' and `guileobjectdir', instead of only one directory > (which you seem to be assuming when talking about > `GUILE_SCHEME_DIR'). > > The mechanism you proposed is _needed_ to allow Guile to play well > with Scheme source files installed in various directories -- in > other words, your mechanism must translate various installation-time > values of `guileschemedir' into a suitable run-time value of > `%load-path'. Your proposal is alright for this. > > 2. While we're at it, we might want to use your mechanism as well for > shared objects. Sorry, I'm not understanding how guilelibdir/guileobjectdir differ from (2). Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user