* making a thunk out of a list
@ 2007-07-24 14:06 Marco Maggi
2007-07-24 14:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-09-18 22:16 ` Neil Jerram
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marco Maggi @ 2007-07-24 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guile-user
Ciao,
maybe this is simple, but today I cannot find a solution;
while iterating over the nodes of a graph I can accumulate
in a list the sequence of function invocations upon each
node (pseudo-code):
(let ((result '()))
;; for each node in the iteration:
(set! result (cons (list action-upon-node node)
result))
;; at the end
(reverse result))
I do it in a method to memoize the iteration; now I
would like to make a thunk out of the list, the following
works:
(lambda () (for-each primitive-eval result))
but I would like a thunk that does not use FOR-EACH. I fail
to see how to do it with a macro, and I cannot APPLY a
LAMBDA, for example the following does not work:
((list lambda '() result))
Ideas?
--
Marco Maggi
"Now feel the funk blast!"
Rage Against the Machine - "Calm like a bomb"
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: making a thunk out of a list
2007-07-24 14:06 making a thunk out of a list Marco Maggi
@ 2007-07-24 14:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-07-24 14:47 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-09-18 22:16 ` Neil Jerram
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2007-07-24 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Maggi; +Cc: guile-user
() "Marco Maggi" <marco.maggi-ipsu@poste.it>
() Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:06:31 +0200
(lambda () (for-each primitive-eval result))
Ideas?
(lambda () (primitive-eval `(begin ,@result)))
thi
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: making a thunk out of a list
2007-07-24 14:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
@ 2007-07-24 14:47 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2007-07-24 14:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Maggi; +Cc: guile-user
() Thien-Thi Nguyen <ttn@gnuvola.org>
() Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:37:49 +0200
() "Marco Maggi" <marco.maggi-ipsu@poste.it>
() Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:06:31 +0200
(lambda () (for-each primitive-eval result))
Ideas?
(lambda () (primitive-eval `(begin ,@result)))
however, this just produces the thunk form, if you want
to really produce a thunk, you'd use:
(primitive-eval `(lambda () ,@result))
thi
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: making a thunk out of a list
2007-07-24 14:06 making a thunk out of a list Marco Maggi
2007-07-24 14:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
@ 2007-09-18 22:16 ` Neil Jerram
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Neil Jerram @ 2007-09-18 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marco Maggi; +Cc: guile-user
"Marco Maggi" <marco.maggi-ipsu@poste.it> writes:
> Ciao,
>
> maybe this is simple, but today I cannot find a solution;
> while iterating over the nodes of a graph I can accumulate
> in a list the sequence of function invocations upon each
> node (pseudo-code):
>
> (let ((result '()))
> ;; for each node in the iteration:
> (set! result (cons (list action-upon-node node)
> result))
> ;; at the end
> (reverse result))
>
> I do it in a method to memoize the iteration; now I
> would like to make a thunk out of the list, the following
> works:
>
> (lambda () (for-each primitive-eval result))
>
> but I would like a thunk that does not use FOR-EACH. I fail
> to see how to do it with a macro, and I cannot APPLY a
> LAMBDA, for example the following does not work:
>
> ((list lambda '() result))
>
> Ideas?
You've probably solved this by now, but I found your question curious,
so...
You have a list of nodes, and you have a procedure f that you want to
apply to each node. So that's just `(map f nodes)', isn't it?
But then you want to delay the f calls, and wrap the whole thing up
in a thunk. So:
(define (make-delayed-map-thunk f nodes)
(lambda ()
(map f nodes)))
I guess it can't really be this simple, so what am I missing?
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-09-18 22:16 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-07-24 14:06 making a thunk out of a list Marco Maggi
2007-07-24 14:37 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-07-24 14:47 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2007-09-18 22:16 ` Neil Jerram
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).