From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: RPX 1.0 available Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:18:41 +0100 Message-ID: <87k4vumd4u.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <873a2k58ov.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87wrzvy22p.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262860275 30455 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 10:31:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 10:31:15 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 11:31:08 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSpdx-0002M1-FI for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:31:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34714 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSpdx-0004BT-GH for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSpbV-00021W-3D for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:28:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSpbT-0001zE-CS for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:28:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=46616 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSpbS-0001yj-Io for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:28:30 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out05a.alice.it ([85.33.3.5]:2746) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSpbS-0007X9-5f for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 05:28:30 -0500 Original-Received: from FBCMMO01.fbc.local ([192.168.68.195]) by smtp-OUT05A.alice.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:21:06 +0100 Original-Received: from FBCMCL01B05.fbc.local ([192.168.69.86]) by FBCMMO01.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:21:06 +0100 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain ([79.21.69.26]) by FBCMCL01B05.fbc.local with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Thu, 7 Jan 2010 11:21:06 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1NSpRx-0001Vr-Ua for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 11:18:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87wrzvy22p.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:12:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Jan 2010 10:21:06.0843 (UTC) FILETIME=[1FAD76B0:01CA8F83] X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1+ X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7601 Archived-At: () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) () Wed, 06 Jan 2010 11:12:14 +0100 Hello! Greetings! Excellent, and nice to see it=E2=80=99s 100% Scheme code! Well, as you can see, *which* 100% is still a question... I=E2=80=99m looking forward for the 1.9/2.0 port. :-) Me too. Currently =E2=80=98ttn-do=E2=80=99 fails to build for me with 1.9: ERROR: In procedure module-variable: ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting module): #f ERROR: In procedure module-variable: ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting module): #f Thanks for reporting this. I don't expect to address this problem specifically; perhaps it will sort itself out in the scheduled general revamping of ttn-do (you can monitor its NEWS for "tested with Guile 1.9"). BTW, what would you think of releasing the X11-related part of =E2=80=98ttn-do=E2=80=99 as a standalone library? I'd rather get all of ttn-do to be Guile 1.9 hostable, then do the split. I think that would be most expedient. On the other hand, the X11-related parts could do with some re-design -- both interface and internals -- and that might benefit from early separation. More modular requires more communication (between programmers, the code itself, and client code), which is a struggle for old frogs like me, but seems to be like water to you tadpoles. Hmmm, we'll see... Should read: http://www.gnuvola.org/software/rpx/ . Good catch; thanks. thi