From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: RPX 1.0 available Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:05:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87k4vo5mcs.fsf@gnu.org> References: <873a2k58ov.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87wrzvy22p.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4vumd4u.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263247572 18062 80.91.229.12 (11 Jan 2010 22:06:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:06:12 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 11 23:06:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUSOh-0007pR-ER for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:06:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52724 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUSOh-00073x-Gd for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:06:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUSOX-00072w-Oj for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUSOT-0006yr-2T for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:05:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=50023 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUSOS-0006yY-QI for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:05:48 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:50626) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUSOQ-0002Ea-Bd for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:05:46 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NUSOC-0007W0-5k for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:05:32 +0100 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:05:32 +0100 Original-Received: from ludo by reverse-83.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 23:05:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reverse-83.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 22 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niv=F4se?= an 218 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 83C4 F8E5 10A3 3B4C 5BEA D15D 77DD 95E2 EA52 ECF4 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:N/W5vQVej41UA430O0NVswhElJs= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7604 Archived-At: Hi Thien-Thi, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > () ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) [...] > BTW, what would you think of releasing the X11-related part of > ‘ttn-do’ as a standalone library? > > I'd rather get all of ttn-do to be Guile 1.9 hostable, then do the > split. I think that would be most expedient. On the other hand, the > X11-related parts could do with some re-design -- both interface and > internals -- and that might benefit from early separation. More modular > requires more communication (between programmers, the code itself, and > client code), which is a struggle for old frogs like me, but seems to be > like water to you tadpoles. Hmmm, we'll see... “Tadpoles”, funny, uh. ;-) Anyway I’ll surely monitor all this. Thanks, Ludo’.