unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: on coding a portable R6RS package supporting Guile and its FFI
Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:57:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87k3qlemkr.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87d2wee6kf.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic Courtès"'s message of "Tue, 05 Feb 2013 23:31:28 +0100")

On Tue 05 Feb 2013 23:31, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> This would be less of a problem if we had “immediate pointers” [0].
> Would the retagging in 2.1 allow this?

The tc3 itag allocation in wip-retagging is:

  * tc3:
  *   000:  A heap object with a tag word on the heap
  *   001:  Some other immediate
  *   010:  A pair
  *   011:  Small integer (odd)
  *   100:  (Unallocated tc3.)
  *   101:  (Unallocated tc3.)
  *   110:  A struct
  *   111:  Small integer (even)

And SCM_IMP is:

  #define SCM_IMP(x) 		(1 & SCM_UNPACK (x))

So perhaps 101 could be an immediate pointer.  Dunno.  Pretty nasty
stuff!

> (At FOSDEM, Luca Saiu rightfully noted that we could use 4-bit tags
> instead of 3-bit tags on 64-bit arches, which would give us the needed
> room here.)

GC_malloc still returns eight-byte aligned memory hunks on 64-bit, no?

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/



  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-06 10:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-17 10:53 on coding a portable R6RS package supporting Guile and its FFI Marco Maggi
2013-01-27 15:08 ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-01-28  3:00   ` Daniel Hartwig
2013-02-05 17:38 ` Andy Wingo
2013-02-05 19:29   ` Noah Lavine
2013-02-06  8:36     ` Andy Wingo
2013-02-06 13:25       ` Noah Lavine
2013-02-05 22:31   ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-02-06 10:57     ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2013-02-08 14:10       ` Ludovic Courtès
2013-02-08 14:37         ` Andy Wingo
2013-02-08 15:52           ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87k3qlemkr.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).