From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile 2.0.9 build on mingw Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:16:18 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3m39e8t.fsf@pobox.com> References: <83sj1hv2ml.fsf@gnu.org> <874ndx9y7h.fsf@pobox.com> <83ip2bt4qk.fsf@gnu.org> <8761xqhyyt.fsf@gnu.org> <83li6mt18y.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqq3mcq9.fsf@gnu.org> <87k3m3kor5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1370812601 16415 80.91.229.3 (9 Jun 2013 21:16:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 21:16:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jun 09 23:16:43 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ulmyg-0004ta-AJ for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 23:16:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40937 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ulmyf-0000kk-LI for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:16:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55500) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlmyX-0000ke-Uf for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:16:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlmyV-0001ga-OF for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:56331 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UlmyS-0001fh-Kw; Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:16:28 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDB7A9DC; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:16:27 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=B7TK2X11ce3c Tp8qru8mKNAdSy8=; b=HE6Dbamfx+b7XT4o4+ytujQzPHxDZHY7okkfUznan/PD KL5xh1KZTwKsO57jCEugWCCOAnRck3T+sSoE6p34j5xjGRbOUxRMPlnKlvtwnB9I AaKuGIL14yqH8kJL1AQBwocQMitsXApMhxyR2MgrfzBj9chwvxaPIebbnREAHTw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=C8Yf/4 ePjeyOGn1tS+sNQSPqm7J2mxM1irvLF4NQAMmr5f8GS7P+6sDNZHcYfvd7pIVxAv /ZwTg5/1dxvXkcZTEbM/8dxoRJLesRNJVT36PbzlsCdBxKj8jHrEahHHJ0d8lVrL 4w/UoT+by23/OVtyM6ANW/pFPECR8bEx1eRro= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147F0A9DB; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:16:27 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83ACDA9DA; Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:16:26 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87k3m3kor5.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sun, 09 Jun 2013 22:33:50 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D85491D8-D149-11E2-BF2E-9F710E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-Received-From: 208.72.237.25 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10418 Archived-At: On Sun 09 Jun 2013 22:33, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > However, that warning doesn=E2=80=99t take into account the signal thread= , nor > the GC thread (if any). So, although that seems unlikely, there could > still be issues, for instance if the =E2=80=98scm_fork=E2=80=99 call happ= ens while > =E2=80=98signal_delivery_thread_mutex=E2=80=99 is locked. In theory the signal thread is counted among the threads -- iirc anyway. The signal-handling thread is kicked off at the first call to sigaction, which shouldn't happen there, right? Also there should be no GC threads active at that point. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/