From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Arne Babenhauserheide Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: GNU Guile 2.1.7 released (beta) Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:46:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87k28fmqhu.fsf@web.de> References: <87y3x3zt6v.fsf@pobox.com> <87tw7kviu6.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487959131 22653 195.159.176.226 (24 Feb 2017 17:58:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 17:58:51 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.16; emacs 25.1.1 Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 24 18:58:44 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1chK8d-0004qS-JN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:58:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chK8j-0003PP-8y for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:58:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chJws-0005JO-Rl for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:46:31 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chJwr-0004iy-Tx for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:46:30 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.3]:57102) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1chJwm-0004hH-Gz; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 12:46:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fluss ([85.212.10.211]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb003 [213.165.67.108]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MT8cQ-1crfmg1br4-00S5ss; Fri, 24 Feb 2017 18:46:08 +0100 In-reply-to: <87tw7kviu6.fsf@pobox.com> X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6v2LbCxuYwC0sBEkj45MSp6NP+MIxVEaDVHwwpoHy2A6iVwK5YV VJunW6guKHjoLJ1uumrw8o3wuJ9CADHxpHA3ki4ZFRKxOeJI0gxUpklhM4xOv8UyLuAvPaF 0v6ATKI5jcOwEJpEMPRfzuRLeetjE32FF0yyF1Yzh6VGyPUce3lFrfnO1mMHE3xYsR0uBrm SGO+qp98pbZGFpazfj9nw== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:0fjYNHeyPok=:cutBB6RCX0+/dOxvo9lPkF Sbj2rAthL6qxhKvprrxBW+lys3XCJ7zjUgnPhqxywvJs5cFPsbQlLWIoGsedSpByd0LHfmC/R /WXt07yI2eJDRxrwoxuksOJeuCv1dvuQeE3eNsAGX4V5Vc5PtCpS/Acjg2ybBHH4lSegRgFBT +YdpYXTFTRA82r5Yx9WuvYiIbKybyrrDIPzATawlGwlYSFe/kTf3ORQYmu8tmnOR8WHNRQvUl LtdtL08cZQeY0OJmorYNFCLt8yEj7qlmDWRPuuGpKFIMyEjTIY/VaHsiqQraWQyMlQ6soLmLc jIr9gNRY9vUgFZhk73agAk1y1jjcVLPmiDhOvW5zdXs0VVd0rHqMKM+4hqrVAwtuUTHmByjvm RDnq5R0jxhBAie5egVKX02yfZUALCZEJ+ain+0J/tb6qrV5IWu5xEF33z+2GttqaoNXbv0xZn sBgTzw/rWS/FCbkqhzDBjx5BO0+jiYhHo5T+WHAooNhx5NA2hogyFToXRLeGMF8cVPLX9AEw+ Gg9xbUZ9UcTDHFffZo9yWCKOZIz5CNCbgsDedIPzsYSHuA7aMwKLOzqeG0MHWJBJz+Rl+HKph wlQGqCwg5dVxZpFIdDLmTv/v0/uJlp6VTQi+1TzxEjH1+xHBO9RDXvAknV/lfI40ZFanhTVuI sHEDik86HNIY4xnq+vOkMjYz7bi12VEzezMuayHH44jHm7uokivB6P35/z91xEpeifniZlPMg f/AnxxXfOLakHJGJhjpqqKG0gEZJL43mb4yE210sMciZHMK1/HGiDtpaXvU= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.3 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13320 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:18948 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andy Wingo writes: > I think that the 2.1.x series is ready to go. Nice! > Release blocker bugs principally concern ABI. For example the foreign > objects facility which was applied to 2.0 and 2.2 and then rolled out > from 2.0 because maybe it's not an interface that we want to support in > the future -- well that is still part of 2.2 and if we released today we > would indeed have to support it. It's that kind of question. The main strategical question I see for that is: Does anything make it harder to complete or improve the lilypond transition to Guile 2? Is there something which would need to be done before 2.2 which could make it easier for lilypond developers? Best wishes, Arne =2D-=20 Unpolitisch sein hei=C3=9Ft politisch sein ohne es zu merken --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYsHFeAAoJEBPvjUUkA8PrZEIP+wS8vA7OcjmHD44Fk7clG3oI lBsI8CwCxuHWIRkpYp4jHPQQGw20gBxGrb1bS3XAiUnhyCLSodPHUqJSZvBXV47B XcdMkZj9w/hAOwr+UNWDRcuN+XiJFpF5Vvs82kUHF03mMnucn3fZ2Rhz5wjFQLfb RbkVxTlPr40kLt347CJm3YtqavC1aZMY6/jhpdFhalScAvjOUdwX/vqxPdVxoEmJ Oa21qdoQNVYcF96sB5cYctZGkhembBZoJWsrxViLIl0099WQlpExFItQybS+kls0 pecQXS/IieuXk5mRqaBt8eXBClOmGulmrbOpqaCl3+kUHovsIvTI2YsyyTgiIv+x lGLmel8RJEA5XLU94CZewb8dFHI8+3UA8nAMr2vtucGc9eO+1YfUjiusyTd0dDv4 FklojqJoh+25idxj9lmwCxRbcGDEYuCsXInUQTS/EAv3JHxga4ObDRTq6uSkGGey H0+QtbyFvFaTuKHo5U3QAwFd9MT9PaJmgv8CzqOGSm6EGJHHiRjKbNvu2DmH+kVe ZJe6on8LaGyyBfPU4Mqlkoi7fRQ/Dm7uT8acEzd9GX8gUgjuM5EskPS5s2c5btFT Sb8ZJe3UOhBLQRQrO8jnVESw2Qn1o7A3le3OqfWA386AL7x4c+8J8iiEp1UUdqsk HSyNGaCja9IKTfcskW4K =cx/O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--