From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.gtk,gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Just in case... Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:15:00 -0700 Message-ID: <87iqugszkb.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> References: <87wsjgnvp3.fsf@gnu.org> <49dd78620807250305i2704c8aej92190a88a006c744@mail.gmail.com> <4889EFE6.3000409@wilsonjc.us> <49dd78620807280231g3ab15246l2cb9fd49025dcfa7@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620807290108p63704f96v7f0efc139be66112@mail.gmail.com> <87sktsi4tf.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <877ib1mfdu.fsf@raven.defaultvalue.org> <49dd78620808040339xacc8e1dm344af6a93350fbc8@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217920524 7243 80.91.229.12 (5 Aug 2008 07:15:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 07:15:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Guile Users , guile-gtk discussions To: "Neil Jerram" Original-X-From: guile-gtk-general-bounces+glgg-guile-gtk-general=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 05 09:16:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: glgg-guile-gtk-general@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KQGm7-0004Pm-Bm for glgg-guile-gtk-general@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:16:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47764 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQGlB-0007gZ-Lq for glgg-guile-gtk-general@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:15:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQGl8-0007cI-Vh for guile-gtk-general@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:15:07 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KQGl7-0007ZS-U2 for guile-gtk-general@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:15:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51790 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KQGl7-0007Z0-MF; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from mx20.gnu.org ([199.232.41.8]:7054) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQGl7-000121-G9; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:15:05 -0400 Original-Received: from li12-156.members.linode.com ([70.85.129.156] helo=defaultvalue.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KQGl5-0008TG-1c; Tue, 05 Aug 2008 03:15:03 -0400 Original-Received: from omen.defaultvalue.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAAE90D35; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from raven.defaultvalue.org (raven.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.7]) by omen.defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54202341F4; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by raven.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 458577C7E3; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 00:15:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <49dd78620808040339xacc8e1dm344af6a93350fbc8@mail.gmail.com> (Neil Jerram's message of "Mon\, 4 Aug 2008 11\:39\:30 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by mx20.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-gtk-general@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussions about guile-gtk List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-gtk-general-bounces+glgg-guile-gtk-general=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-gtk-general-bounces+glgg-guile-gtk-general=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.gtk:808 gmane.lisp.guile.user:6726 Archived-At: "Neil Jerram" writes: > Many thanks for handling this, Rob. Certainly. Just wish I'd done it sooner. In any case, I've notified debian-release, and presuming we can work out the remaining issues, I think things may be OK. > The ia64 one is fully understood; you just need to add > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=guile.git;a=commit;h=78aa4a8850396801f2e5515565d051b45b4f15b5 OK, I'll install this in a new upload, perhaps tomorrow. > The hppa symptom is the same as (mips, mipsel, powerpc) were seeing > before the latest patches. What kind of architecture is hppa? One place to ask questions would probably be debian-hppa (http://www.debian.org/ports/hppa), and there's also the build log. In addition, I may be able to run some code on an hppa machine if we can figure out something appropriate. > Is there any chance that the patches somehow didn't take for that > arch? The patches should have made it. You can see the exact patch in the new source package in debian/patches/improve-stack-direction-test.diff. It should be very close to the upstream version. > Out of interest, what is the difference between Building and Built > statuses? Hmm, I didn't know either, but here's a description: http://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/wanna-build-states Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4