From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile-SDL 0.4.0 available Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:10:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87iplgg4b3.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <87obvaulws.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87mxauuipf.fsf@pobox.com> <877h1xti6q.fsf@Kagami.home> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324034198 26671 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2011 11:16:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:16:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andy Wingo , guile-user@gnu.org To: Ian Price Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 12:16:34 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVmB-000695-G6 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:16:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVmA-0000eu-Ud for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:16:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:42189) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVm8-0000en-3l for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:16:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVm6-00055v-Vs for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:16:28 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:59968) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVm6-00055r-LA for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 06:16:26 -0500 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain (95.244.64.35) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.023.02) id 4ECA5FDA04AD45ED; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:13:49 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbVgX-0000pR-FI; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 12:10:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <877h1xti6q.fsf@Kagami.home> (Ian Price's message of "Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:32:29 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9049 Archived-At: () Ian Price () Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:32:29 +0000 Andy Wingo writes: > It works with Guile 2.0 if you replace: > > #define MAKE_HASH_TABLE(size) \ > (scm_make_vector (REASONABLE_BUCKET_COUNT (size), SCM_EOL)) > > with > > #define MAKE_HASH_TABLE(size) \ > (scm_c_make_hash_table (size)) I can confirm that with this change it works. Thanks ttn for the release, and thanks andy for saving me some debugging time :) OK, this is a good first and second step. Now the sticking point: i am worried that =E2=80=98scm_c_make_hash_table=E2=80=99 is undocumented.