From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile can't find a chinese named file Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <87inovpq82.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <874m0gd3z4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpdc8rx7.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87poj4r04c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87k29c8q3b.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87h94gqz34.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87fuk0ctve.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <878tpsqtzl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83tw8gwffh.fsf@gnu.org> <8737g0qsp8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sho0wdgm.fsf@gnu.org> <83poj4wc8n.fsf@gnu.org> <1726997629.41537.1485808958146@mail.yahoo.com> <83mve7x5v3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485852705 21691 195.159.176.226 (31 Jan 2017 08:51:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 08:51:45 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 09:51:41 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cYUA9-0005Sq-2s for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 09:51:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36741 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYUAC-00060b-VH for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:51:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40327) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYU9s-00060W-Sw for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:51:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYU9p-00021f-RM for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:51:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:44176) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cYU9g-0001xc-Gm; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:51:21 -0500 Original-Received: from x2f3b97a.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.243.185.122]:45172 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cYU9f-0003cu-L8; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 03:51:12 -0500 In-Reply-To: <83mve7x5v3.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 31 Jan 2017 05:31:28 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13159 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 20:42:38 +0000 (UTC) >> From: Mike Gran >> Cc: "guile-user@gnu.org" >> >> Earlier in the 2.0.x release series, Guile had a hack where it started >> up in a Latin-1 encoding, which would be capable of storing any >> 8-bit string of bytes, even if they weren't Latin-1. > > Latin-1 has holes in the 0..255 range, so it isn't very appropriate in > this situation. What Guile calls "Latin-1" is really unibyte. -- David Kastrup