From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: How to make GNU Guile more successful Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:23:38 +0100 Message-ID: <87inno9lo5.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <9386102A-AA6C-4CC1-82EE-7758106A435C@openmailbox.org> <87shmssh9c.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: guile-user@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1488706105 30480 195.159.176.226 (5 Mar 2017 09:28:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:28:25 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Mar 05 10:28:21 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSSh-0007Cp-Gb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 10:28:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38117 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSSn-0001SV-IS for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:28:25 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52040) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSSC-0001RK-JB for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:27:49 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSS9-0002bf-PE for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:27:48 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.agora-net.com ([67.59.132.6]:46342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSS9-0002bM-Kg for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:27:45 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by mail.agora-net.com with local (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSS7-0006hE-DQ for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:27:43 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckRSE-0004tP-ND for guile-user@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:23:46 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87shmssh9c.fsf@web.de> (Arne Babenhauserheide's message of "Sun, 05 Mar 2017 01:23:59 +0100") X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ttn@gnuvola.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.agora-net.com); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 67.59.132.6 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13404 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Arne Babenhauserheide () Sun, 05 Mar 2017 01:23:59 +0100 Just having a geiser setup for Emacs properly documented =E2=80=94 or maybe an Emacs customized for Scheme development =E2=80=94 would help a lot, I think. Could you please summarize (or point to a summary of) Geiser documentation deficiencies? =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen ----------------------------------------------- (defun responsep (query) (pcase (context query) (`(technical ,ml) (correctp ml)) ...)) 748E A0E8 1CB8 A748 9BFA =2D-------------------------------------- 6CE4 6703 2224 4C80 7502 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAli7ywwACgkQZwMiJEyAdQJ3jgCfaPdfgg+kKTpHHzfp7hmDcUh8 AlIAn3wFvLv7xaxkROOIRstTaj/kl+wF =3Hq7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--