From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eric E Moore Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: 1.6.0 problems with libguilereadline-v-12 and fix Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:29:21 +0100 Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <87heggiedq.fsf@dyn006239.shef.ac.uk> References: <20020918203311.3C5FA3F28@fnord.ir.bbn.com> <87k7ljgfvd.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87d6radoa5.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87it108z2f.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1032816631 21331 127.0.0.1 (23 Sep 2002 21:30:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 21:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17tamj-0005Xu-00 for ; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 23:30:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17tamV-0004r6-00; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17talk-0004RN-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:29:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 17tali-0004PD-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:29:27 -0400 Original-Received: from dyn006239.shef.ac.uk ([143.167.6.239]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 17talh-0004Mz-00 for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 17:29:25 -0400 Original-Received: by dyn006239.shef.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 909F36E88; Mon, 23 Sep 2002 22:29:24 +0100 (BST) Original-To: guile-user@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (prj@po.cwru.edu's message of "Mon, 23 Sep 2002 16:06:25 -0400") Original-Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.2 Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1079 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1079 --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc) writes: > Yes, I know. I never meant to say otherwise. But if their authors > participate in the slashpackage registry, that won't happen. The > authors won't release packages that use names that they haven't > registered. The benefit of collision avoidance is derived from > authors' participation, not admins'. Of course, if you maintain a global registry of command names, that authors participate in, then just installing everything in /usr/bin won't ever have any collisions either. All you've done is move the collisions to the registry (you can't *register* a previously used name). =2D-=20 Eric E. Moore --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE9j4e040OczkogoRERAiAtAKCxsQM4ER8iDZwLZV1R/0Ynp9swRwCguhl0 wXdYL8oFzQu/xUwplfc7qFk= =zrfO -----END PGP MESSAGE----- --=-=-=-- _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user