From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: defined? in module Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:54:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87hbxb9x6n.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1247842549 22297 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2009 14:55:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:55:49 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 17 16:55:42 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MRoqb-0000KS-6k for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:55:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRoqa-0005nK-7Z for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:55:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRoqH-0005mO-VZ for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MRoqD-0005km-8T for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=42138 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MRoqC-0005kc-VY for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:55:17 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:42574 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MRoqC-0003sj-GX for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:55:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1MRoq5-0004FH-4A for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:55:09 +0000 Original-Received: from laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr ([147.210.128.170]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:55:09 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 14:55:09 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 37 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: laptop-147-210-128-170.labri.fr X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 29 Messidor an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Kp+pLnv1P5YYqgFhn9ZqsBY/ev0= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7363 Archived-At: Hello Daniel, I realized this question was left unanswered. Daniel Kraft writes: > I'm trying to check if a given name is bound within some module. It > seems (from the documentation) that module objects are considered > environments; but this does not work: > > scheme@(guile-user)> (defined? 'abc (current-module)) You want to use `module-defined?': --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- scheme@(guile-user)> (module-defined? (current-module) '+) #t --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The second argument to `defined?' is probably only valid in the context of the evaluator: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- guile> (version) $1 = "1.8.6" guile> (defined? '+ (the-environment)) $2 = #t guile> (let ((x 2)) (defined? 'x (the-environment))) $3 = #t --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Maybe `defined?' should be changed in 1.9 to accept a module as its second argument? Thanks, Ludo'.