Thomas Morley writes: [...] > > Hi Alex, > > thanks for the hint. > Would a patch like attached be sufficient? > I am not sure. Looking into the source, in the "Current ports as parameters" section, you can see that 'current-*-port' are being defined. They feel like some kind of wrappers around the primitive versions defined in libguile. I don't know what are their uses and whether we should have something similar for 'current-load-port'. > Best, > Harm