From: <janneke@gnu.org>
To: Mikael Djurfeldt <mikael@djurfeldt.com>
Cc: guile-devel <guile-devel@gnu.org>,
"Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>, guile-user <guile-user@gnu.org>,
"Andy Wingo" <wingo@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Keywords in GOOPS methods
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 13:20:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87h67zxxxn.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA2XvwKnZmeNj2tjX_3ukna9fGcUornpA9eEEOnZFexsNMiEMA@mail.gmail.com> (Mikael Djurfeldt's message of "Thu, 21 Nov 2024 23:51:45 +0100")
Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
Hello,
> That was elegant. :-)
:)
> Nope---haven't seen it. (Or, at least I do not remember it.)
>
> Maybe I should have a look at what the optimizer can do about Mark's
> code. (As you might have seen, my code is a modification of the method
> syntax implementation itself.)
Yes, I didn't quite get if this brings something else too, except for
the obvious
> Any opinions on what is best: Having a define-method* or having the
> functionality in define-method itself?
...which I think in your version, not having to use define-method*
feels more elegant/GOOPSy to me, as it's all overloads/generics,
but I have no strong opionion on this. Thanks for working on this!
Greetings,
Janneke
--
Janneke Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond https://LilyPond.org
Freelance IT https://www.JoyOfSource.com | Avatar® https://AvatarAcademy.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-22 12:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-19 16:41 Keywords in GOOPS methods Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-21 20:33 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-21 20:33 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-21 22:00 ` janneke
2024-11-21 22:51 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-22 11:46 ` Tomas Volf
2024-11-22 12:28 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-22 12:20 ` janneke [this message]
2024-11-22 12:29 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-22 23:04 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-25 23:51 ` Keywords in define-method Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-26 0:13 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-26 9:33 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-26 18:40 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-23 15:31 ` Keywords in GOOPS methods Maxime Devos via General Guile related discussions
2024-11-23 15:41 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
2024-11-23 15:49 ` Maxime Devos via General Guile related discussions
2024-11-24 11:56 ` Mikael Djurfeldt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87h67zxxxn.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=janneke@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=mikael@djurfeldt.com \
--cc=wingo@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).