From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Comparing two hash tables for equality? Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:46:44 -0400 Message-ID: <87ftyxeq4r.fsf@netris.org> References: <2418985.EcWt8OQBW1@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> <87o9dovj4z.fsf@netris.org> <8946101.LFvQY6EkbR@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1535518013 21471 195.159.176.226 (29 Aug 2018 04:46:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 04:46:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: Aleksandar Sandic Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 29 06:46:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fusNU-0005T7-GG for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 06:46:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41150 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fusPa-0001rk-UW for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:48:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fusP3-0001qn-40 for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fusOz-0005T2-VO for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:53454) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fusOz-0005SH-Qk for guile-user@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:48:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fusOy-00088j-Ey; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 00:48:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8946101.LFvQY6EkbR@aleksandar-ixtreme-m5740> (Aleksandar Sandic's message of "Tue, 28 Aug 2018 00:14:25 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 64.112.178.59 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:14811 Archived-At: Aleksandar Sandic writes: > I did not know about HAMTs, looks interesting. It's not relevant to my use- > case, but it's an interesting topic to look into. Thanks. There's an implementation of HAMTs that works with Guile in the following "Purely Functional Data Structures in Scheme" library: https://github.com/ijp/pfds I'm not sure off-hand how well optimized they are. Mark