From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user
Subject: Re: guile -s  is it necessary?
Date: 19 Oct 2002 00:07:56 +0200
Sender: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <87elan1jur.fsf@zagadka.ping.de>
References: <20021015122146.GA418@www>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1034990229 5264 80.91.224.249 (19 Oct 2002 01:17:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:17:09 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: guile-user@gnu.org
Return-path: <guile-user-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 182iEl-0001Me-00
	for <guile-user@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 03:17:08 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 182fIW-0002Bt-00; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:08:48 -0400
Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 182fHX-0001om-00
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:07:47 -0400
Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10)
	id 182fHV-0001ns-00
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:07:46 -0400
Original-Received: from mail.dokom.net ([195.253.8.218])
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10)
	id 182fHU-0001nS-00
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Oct 2002 18:07:44 -0400
Original-Received: from dialin.speedway43.dip26.dokom.de
	([195.138.43.26] helo=zagadka.ping.de ident=qmailr)
	by mail.dokom.net with smtp (Exim 3.32 #2)
	id 182fI0-00011D-00
	for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 00:08:16 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 12756 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Oct 2002 22:07:56 -0000
Original-To: tomas@fabula.de
In-Reply-To: <20021015122146.GA418@www>
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Errors-To: guile-user-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:guile-user@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: General Guile related discussions <guile-user.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user>,
	<mailto:guile-user-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/guile-user/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:1214
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:1214

tomas@fabula.de writes:

> Is there any particular reason (besides of higher symmetry)
> you have to invoke a script as ``guile -s <script name>''
> instead of just ``guile <script name>''?

I don't know of any.  Allowing "guile <script name>" seems very
natural and rhymes with Perl, Python, Sh, and probably others.

There don't seem to be real objections, so: do you have a patch? :-)

-- 
GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3  331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405


_______________________________________________
Guile-user mailing list
Guile-user@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user