From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Determining programatically whether the interpreter is Guile or Clisp or Emcs Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:48:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87eh9zt6qo.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <23837d79-03e3-4792-a4b7-e3a6c96ed390@email.android.com> <20130731102042.GB15597@seid-online.de> <1375319563.8252.65.camel@Renee-desktop.suse> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1376311589 7859 80.91.229.3 (12 Aug 2013 12:46:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 12:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?55m944GE54aK?= Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 12 14:46:31 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V8rW0-0008G7-Mi for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:46:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51015 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8rW0-0007ZU-CM for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:46:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8rVi-0007XQ-Kp for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8rVX-0001ts-OE for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:50262) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V8rVX-0001tg-DR for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 08:45:59 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (87.9.131.145) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 51FA21FE037EC323; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:45:49 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1V8rYB-0000Wg-GI; Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:48:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?B?Ig==?= =?utf-8?B?55m944GE54aKIidz?= message of "Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:42:31 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10624 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () =E7=99=BD=E3=81=84=E7=86=8A () Thu, 01 Aug 2013 16:42:31 +0400 So if anyone would have alternate ideas [...] If you are comfortable w/ starting from a Lisp (Emacs or CLISP) base, perhaps you can find fruitful the "recode" facility of CEDET: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/SemanticRecoder This addresses the (unavoidable, you will see) translation requirement, not the "distinguishing the fragility of superficial syntax similarity" part (avoidable, but nonetheless fun to experiment with :-D). Anyway, you can see what pains CEDET takes to grow text into a (com)pliant tree. =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlII2aIACgkQZwMiJEyAdQKrtQCfWX8xtcnNHnc3apwn3CAom4h5 S6cAn15IYpKv0c6EF5c5tZj48/1RsQeu =t6Af -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--