From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: mark.d.witmer@gmail.com Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: [ANN] Guile-WM 0.1/Guile XCB 1.1 Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:13:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87eh5yiia0.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87eh9iw7l8.fsf@markwitmer.com> <87haeebxyv.fsf@tines.lan> <87txido2ga.fsf@gmail.com> <87vc2tabrt.fsf@tines.lan> <87sixwe1qi.fsf@markwitmer.com> <87d2p1a7lp.fsf@tines.lan> <878uzowy3w.fsf@honeybear.home> <87eh9f474l.fsf@gmail.com> <874n6uyive.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385821970 13023 80.91.229.3 (30 Nov 2013 14:32:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 14:32:50 +0000 (UTC) To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 30 15:32:57 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VmlbK-0000WN-0r for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 15:32:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VmlbJ-0007K6-Kb for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:32:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54019) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vmct2-0003Na-UT for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:14:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vmcsu-0003RN-Sg for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:14:36 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vmcsu-0003R9-M2 for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 00:14:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vmcst-00017X-AZ for guile-user@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:14:27 +0100 Original-Received: from cpe-184-58-115-186.woh.res.rr.com ([184.58.115.186]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:14:27 +0100 Original-Received: from mark.d.witmer by cpe-184-58-115-186.woh.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Nov 2013 06:14:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 34 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpe-184-58-115-186.woh.res.rr.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xJhbUOUAzn8+lfNjVBCP84i9JW0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 30 Nov 2013 09:32:46 -0500 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:10902 Archived-At: Mark H Weaver writes: > Hi Mark, > > Shortly after the releases of Guile XCB 1.1 and Guile WM 0.1, some > important problems were fixed in the build system. Would you be willing > to produce new tarball releases? > > Several of us are interested in Guile WM and would like to make it > easier for new users to play with and hack on. Toward that end, we'd > like to package it for GNU Guix , which has a > policy of using only upstream tarballs. > > Thanks! > Mark > > Thanks for looking; at your suggestion, I've updated the version numbers and put new tarballs on my site. http://www.markwitmer.com/dist/guile-wm-0.2.tar.gz http://www.markwitmer.com/dist/guile-xcb-1.2.tar.gz I'm glad there's interest in including guile-wm with guix. Hopefully I'll have some time in the near future to keep improving it. So far I've been using it as my only WM for the past few months and it's been working well within its small feature set. Suggestions or useful patches would be most welcome! Thanks -- Mark Witmer