From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Marko Rauhamaa Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile can't find a chinese named file Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:38:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87efyyt7jb.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> References: <878tpsqtzl.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <20170214221914.1483ddb1@bother.homenet> <20170215091832.GA28017@tuxteam.de> <83inobz8yl.fsf@gnu.org> <20170215202056.GB3723@tuxteam.de> <83d1ejyz2e.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3x7kvwr.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <837f4qzo31.fsf@gnu.org> <87h93u4q5e.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <831suyzm11.fsf@gnu.org> <83zihmy6wb.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpcq38sa.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87efyy4k4c.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87mvdmv3kg.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <8760ka4drd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h93uv1kl.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <871suy4cha.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <877f4qv0a8.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <87wpcq2w58.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871suyuyby.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <83tw7uxg1o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487264506 23053 195.159.176.226 (16 Feb 2017 17:01:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 17:01:46 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, dak@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 16 18:01:42 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cePR6-0005Xv-Hc for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:01:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47940 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cePRC-00016n-BN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:01:46 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57111) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceP52-0003En-Mr for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:38:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceP52-0008Lw-0q for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:38:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:1bc8:1a0:5384:7a2b:cbff:fe9f:e508] (port=33272 helo=pacujo.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ceP50-0008L6-Jn; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 11:38:50 -0500 Original-Received: from elektro.pacujo.net (192.168.1.200) by elektro.pacujo.net; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:38:49 +0200 Original-Received: by elektro.pacujo.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:38:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <83tw7uxg1o.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:21:23 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2001:1bc8:1a0:5384:7a2b:cbff:fe9f:e508 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:13263 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii : > Why is that a problem? Unicode generally mandates that equivalent > character (a.k.a. "codepoint") sequences shall be handled the same by > applications, both while processing the text (e.g., searching it etc.) > and when displaying it. As I just said in another reply, emacs 25.1 isn't handling them the same even though it maybe should. Now, should Guile handle them the same? (Python thinks they are different.) Marko