unofficial mirror of guile-user@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_bab@web.de>
To: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
Cc: Blake Shaw <blake@sweatshoppe.org>,
	Luis Felipe <luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com>,
	Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>,
	guile-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Wiki && Re: [feature request] merge sxml->html from (haunt html) into guile?
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 08:19:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edz86ld4.fsf@web.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a9e203b96f504bed5e3ab99ad5173aedbb04ec95.camel@telenet.be>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1055 bytes --]


Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> writes:

> Blake Shaw schreef op wo 29-06-2022 om 01:34 [+0700]:
>> Which brings up another thing I've been considering working on thats
>> been discussed in the Guix community: the need for click-to-edit
>> wiki, written in Guile. [...]
>
> I don't think ‘written in Guile’ has been discussed?
>
> Also, I don't see the point in writing our own wiki software in Guile
> when there's already plenty of Wiki software in existence with lots of
> tools for moderation, version control, backups, lots of testing, etc.
> Why not reuse pre-existing work instead of reinventing the wheel (likely
> poorly, at least at first)?

There are at least two good reason for re-inventing the wheel:

- learning the domain
- experimenting with how the ways to a good implementation differ in another language

If those were rejected out of hand, most existing wiki software would
have never been written.

Best wishes,
Arne
-- 
Unpolitisch sein
heißt politisch sein,
ohne es zu merken.
draketo.de

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 1125 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-29  6:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27  6:57 [feature request] merge sxml->html from (haunt html) into guile? Blake Shaw
2022-06-28 13:26 ` Luis Felipe
2022-06-28 18:34   ` Wiki && " Blake Shaw
2022-06-28 20:13     ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 21:05       ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-29  3:26       ` bokr
2022-06-29  6:19       ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-28 19:57 dsmich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87edz86ld4.fsf@web.de \
    --to=arne_bab@web.de \
    --cc=blake@sweatshoppe.org \
    --cc=guile-user@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=luis.felipe.la@protonmail.com \
    --cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).