From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: getopt-long Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:50:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87d3c2rbec.fsf@pobox.com> References: <4ED767B8.9000107@gmail.com> <87hb1fhrel.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1323118233 18218 80.91.229.12 (5 Dec 2011 20:50:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 20:50:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 05 21:50:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RXfUb-0006O3-B6 for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 21:50:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37053 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXfUa-0007wG-QN for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:50:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49807) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXfUX-0007vx-8a for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:50:26 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXfUW-00089n-7l for guile-user@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:50:25 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:35810 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RXfUW-00089i-2c; Mon, 05 Dec 2011 15:50:24 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D878E26; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:50:23 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=7FOytD78mYV5 556b33W8Bwku3hg=; b=hfHx0rk5z7+1DQ06wpl99EfRBkVi3+FSvr4QMNAFPIo1 VQ0VS9NzBZglwnm1oA/nRDYoVrXbCSDf2d32QKZX31G0PDKRcIF97teUcfQ9CuXX 7IjxRKndW7BT6n4PUyVdr7KSY3thSC+HCrYuUksUdDdV0Ie4CSnrlyNUJCe/FBk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=nCcryT RE0M2gns/kbVK+D+Cr6xm8ikPA6S29dKKiIDP0wHupn+1rPPBeb/TNLXjhu0pmi0 A4CrlopSs460zshLM6ZO6Iyx9maFwZvxU4qIArOnmpP2x2a7fbevXEkaTCI8V7Ue iDbHHioQOefa7Uph49FCAXuM4vXuwTpT9oWBM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A23DA8E25; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:50:23 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0D25B8E24; Mon, 5 Dec 2011 15:50:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87hb1fhrel.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Mon, 05 Dec 2011 18:14:42 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: C066FB6C-1F82-11E1-A889-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 74.115.168.62 X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:9032 Archived-At: On Mon 05 Dec 2011 18:14, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > However, I=E2=80=99d recommend using SRFI-37: it supports multiple occurr= ences > of an option, and has a nicer interface IMO. I like it too, but I use both, and if we can make getopt-long more useful, there doesn't seem to be any harm in that. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/