From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olivier Dion Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: guile or scheme used to implement make or meson Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:56:35 -0400 Message-ID: <87cyyntrzg.fsf@laura> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9456"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" To: Andy Tai , guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 12 15:57:27 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qg3tM-0002CQ-7I for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 15:57:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qg3sz-0002o1-Ad; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:57:02 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qg3sq-0002e9-Ct for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp.polymtl.ca ([132.207.4.11]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qg3sl-00087x-TT for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (modemcable094.169-200-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.169.94]) by smtp.polymtl.ca (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 38CDuZfd017035; Tue, 12 Sep 2023 09:56:40 -0400 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp.polymtl.ca 38CDuZfd017035 In-Reply-To: X-Poly-FromMTA: (modemcable094.169-200-24.mc.videotron.ca [24.200.169.94]) at Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:56:35 +0000 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=132.207.4.11; envelope-from=olivier.dion@polymtl.ca; helo=smtp.polymtl.ca X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:19184 Archived-At: On Mon, 11 Sep 2023, Andy Tai wrote: > Is using Guile, or a similar Scheme implementation, to re-implement > make or meson realistic? By re-implementing do you mean re-writing Make with Guile? That ought to be realistic, but I really do not see the point of it. What is more realistic and useful is to make a build system in Guile where the DSL that replaces Makefiles is Scheme. -- Olivier Dion oldiob.dev