From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Guile 6.4 on NCR MPRAS Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:05:57 +1000 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87brmedm7u.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <1080347191.26226.418.camel@s11> <87ptay9drc.fsf@zip.com.au> <1080601214.26165.709.camel@s11> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1080684719 14529 80.91.224.253 (30 Mar 2004 22:11:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 22:11:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 31 00:11:47 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B8RSV-0006dK-00 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:11:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B8ROX-0000bs-1w for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:07:41 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B8RNo-0000ON-Sp for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:06:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1B8RNI-0000Cm-9x for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.85] (helo=mailout2.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B8RNH-0000Ap-9w for guile-user@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 17:06:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i2UM6G5v030139; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:06:16 +1000 Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2F3C.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.47.60]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id i2UM6EGP004817; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:06:15 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B8RMs-0000f2-00; Wed, 31 Mar 2004 08:05:58 +1000 Original-To: Kevin Pendleton In-Reply-To: <1080601214.26165.709.camel@s11> (Kevin Pendleton's message of "29 Mar 2004 16:00:14 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:3029 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:3029 Kevin Pendleton writes: > > When checking for gethostbyname, it fails both > times, (undefined reference to `gethostbyname'), with and without > -lnsl. config.log will contain the code of the failing program, you can see if it works or if it needs to be massaged. > #include > #include > #include Maybe the test program will need these includes, if there's something silly being done with macros. > The way I understand it, for NCR MP-RAS systems, the system needs to > explicitly link against -lmw to pull in some symbols such as > _mwoflocheckl and others. I see libtool AC_CHECK_LIBM knows to do this on *-ncr-sysv4.3*. We should either use that, or do something similar. Does a program using say "cos" fail to link if -lm is used but not -lmw too? _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user