From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rob Browning Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: Packaging a guile-enabled binary Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 16:50:25 -0500 Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <87brkqllum.fsf@trouble.defaultvalue.org> References: <20040502225824.96251.qmail@web14308.mail.yahoo.com> <20040503144024.GA31268@backlot.linas.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1084578037 8783 80.91.224.253 (14 May 2004 23:40:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 14 May 2004 23:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-user@gnu.org, spikegran@earthlink.net Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 15 01:40:28 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BOmI0-0005IX-00 for ; Sat, 15 May 2004 01:40:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOloJ-0003fc-Sw for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:09:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOlkT-0002lG-L4 for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:05:49 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.34) id 1BOljw-0002fc-Do for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 19:05:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.34) id 1BOkyL-0007yj-Ge for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 18:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [66.93.216.237] (helo=defaultvalue.org) by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BOkfh-00081Y-1O for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 14 May 2004 17:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from trouble.defaultvalue.org (omen.defaultvalue.org [192.168.1.1]) by defaultvalue.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD704094; Fri, 14 May 2004 16:52:04 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by trouble.defaultvalue.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DBC82410C7; Fri, 14 May 2004 16:50:25 -0500 (CDT) Original-To: linas@linas.org (Linas Vepstas) In-Reply-To: <20040503144024.GA31268@backlot.linas.org> (Linas Vepstas's message of "Mon, 3 May 2004 09:40:24 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:3173 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.user:3173 linas@linas.org (Linas Vepstas) writes: > So what's the difference between that and LGPL? > If so, then why isn't guile under LGPL? Good question. As a matter of fact Guile should be under the LGPL with the next release. See NEWS. Although I'm not sure all the relevant files have been changed yet. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4 _______________________________________________ Guile-user mailing list Guile-user@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-user