From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Frank Terbeck Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user Subject: Re: test anything? (Re: My Guile Hacker Handbook) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:12:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87blk6vedr.fsf@ft.bewatermyfriend.org> References: <3364bc82b7660df3ae8613cdadef8b9dac2fe416.camel@korwin-zmijowski.fr> <20200723064626.GA7119@prometheus.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="2316"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Guile User To: Marc Chantreux Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 23 10:12:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jyWLV-0000Ux-HO for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:12:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55652 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyWLU-0001MY-Gr for guile-user@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:12:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52476) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyWLK-0001MQ-TV for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from smtprelay06.ispgateway.de ([80.67.31.103]:36841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jyWLI-0006zk-W6 for guile-user@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 04:12:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [79.194.172.3] (helo=jim.voodoo.lan) by smtprelay06.ispgateway.de with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1jyWLE-0007YN-5C; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:12:36 +0200 Original-Received: by jim.voodoo.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8771761D01B; Thu, 23 Jul 2020 10:12:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200723064626.GA7119@prometheus.u-strasbg.fr> (Marc Chantreux's message of "Thu, 23 Jul 2020 08:46:26 +0200") X-Df-Sender: NDMwNDQ0 Received-SPF: none client-ip=80.67.31.103; envelope-from=ft@bewatermyfriend.org; helo=smtprelay06.ispgateway.de X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/07/23 04:12:36 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "guile-user" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.user:16720 Archived-At: Hi, Marc Chantreux wrote: [=E2=80=A6] >> Hope it can help someone to jump in and hack. > > i just discovered srfi 64 thanks to your page. the thing is: when it > comes to test report, i have one simple rule: TAPs or GTFO. > > so i saw a TAP lib for guile (https://github.com/xevz/guile-tap) which > is not mentioned in the testanything.org/ or guile documentation. I'm similar with test-reporting. TAP is nice and available for every language under the sun. So years back, because I couldn't find a frame- work that would for Guile, I wrote =C2=B9, which emits TAP as well. But = it does not replicate Perl's API. So no "ok" procedure and things like that. I don't think many people use it, but I thought I'd mention it anyway. Regards, Frank =C2=B9 https://github.com/ft/scm-test-tap --=20 In protocol design, perfection has been reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. -- RFC 1925