From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.user,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Killing off scm_init_guile for Guile 2.0 ? Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:57:15 +0100 Message-ID: <87ab9rz4c4.fsf@gnu.org> References: <49dd78620901151530o66a2641ax47e526d15fc09faf@mail.gmail.com> <49dd78620901151548n60b11c7dy335eb3a2702f5e23@mail.gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1232117873 3644 80.91.229.12 (16 Jan 2009 14:57:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:53 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guile-devel@gnu.org To: guile-user@gnu.org Original-X-From: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 16 15:59:06 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-user@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LNqA3-0004eU-6O for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:59:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34112 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNq8m-0000ep-JI for guile-user@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNq8i-0000dv-Bt for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:57:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LNq8g-0000c7-Jv for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:57:39 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38865 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LNq8g-0000bn-EO for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:37324 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LNq8g-0002HC-0x for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 09:57:38 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LNq8a-0000tj-FE for guile-user@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:32 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.227 ([193.50.110.227]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:32 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.227 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:57:32 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.lisp.guile.devel Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.227 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 27 =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niv=F4se?= an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0+HBfJ6f9Ap/YBmHE8C1rA2oUIo= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: guile-user@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General Guile related discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: guile-user-bounces+guile-user=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.user:7060 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:8040 Archived-At: Hi! "Neil Jerram" writes: > 2009/1/15 Neil Jerram : >> >> Thoughts? On the other hand, does moving to BDW-GC take a lot of this >> out of our hands anyway? > > From a quick look, it seems the answer to that is "yes", and hence > moving to BDW-GC will mean that we can keep scm_init_guile with no > cost. So this is probably all moot... but it would still be > interesting to hear if anyone has related thoughts. Indeed, `scm_i_thread' no longer has a `heap_mutex' field (how relieving! ;-)). Ludo'.